Srusti Management Review

A Journal of Management & IT

ISSN NO: 0974-4274(PRINT), ISSN NO: 2582-1148(ONLINE)Listed in Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, INDEXED IN J-GATE E-JOURNAL GATEWAY, EBSCOHOST, PROQUEST, U.S.A. & GOOGLE SCHOLAR A Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal

Team Empowerment

Year 2011
Volume/Issue/Review Month Vol. - IV | Spl. Issue 4 | April
Title Team Empowerment
Authors Snigdha Mohapatra
Broad area Team Empowerment
Abstract
Macro change drivers like global competition, information and technology
innovations, and demographic shifts have required organizations to
rethink their structures and processes. In particular, the flattening and
downsizing of organizations has led to the empowerment of teams in an
attempt to increase flexibility, adaptability, customer responsiveness, and
productiveness. The formation of teams requires the presence of certain
external and internal conditions. The external requisites include support
and direction, such as congruence with strategy, top management support,
clear goals and parameters, and effective selection of employees. The
internal requisites include an emphasis on preparation and training of
employees through initial team building and ongoing team development,
and encouragement of a continual reflective learning cycle. Without the
internal processes for team learning, even an initially successful team
may defeat itself and become unproductive, thereby discouraging further
support for team empowerment initiatives.
Description The classical tall work structures well known during the 1960s and 1970s ceased being competitive during the 1980s and 1990s. Global competition, growing information availability, technological innovations, and shifts in the demographic make-up of the wor
File
Referenceses
  • Aaron, H (1992). Something Wrong with American Business. Business Marketing, 77(1),
  • 38-39.
  • Bassin, M (1996). From Teams to Partnerships. HR Magazine, 41(1), 84-86.
  • Bettenhausen, KL (1991). Five Years of Group Research: What we have Learned and What
  • Needs to be Addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2), 345-381.
  • Team Empowerment
  • 100 Srusti Management Review, Vol-IV,Issue-IV, April-2011
  • Bettenhausem, KL, and Murnighan, JK (1985). The Emergence of Norms in Competitive
  • Decision-making Groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 350-372.
  • Campion, MA, and Higgs, AC (October, 1995). Design Work Teams to Increase Productivity
  • and Satisfaction. HR Magazine, 40(10), 101-107.
  • Daudelin, MW (1996), Learning from Experience Through Reflection. Organizational Dynamics
  • 36-48.
  • Foushee, HC (1984). Dyads and Triads at 35,000 Feet: Factors Affecting Group Process
  • and Aircrew Performance. American Psychologist, 39, 885-893.
  • Hammonds, KH (October 25, 1991). Where did they Go Wrong? Business Week, 26-28.
  • Hanson, R, Porterfield, RI, and Ames, K (1995). Employee Empowerment at Risk: Effects
  • of Recent NLRB Rulings. Academy of Management Executive, 9(2), 45-56.
  • Heckscher, C (November/December, 1995). The Failure of Participatory Management Across
  • the Board, 16-21.
  • Hoerr, J (November 28, 1988). Work Teams can rev up Paper Pushers Too. Business Week,
  • 68-69.
  • Hoerr, J (July 10, 1989). The Payoff from Teamwork. Business Week, 56-62.
  • Lee, C (June, 1990). Beyond Teamwork. Training, 25-32.
  • Maples, MF (1988). Group Development: Extending Tuckman’s Theory. Journal for Specialists
  • in Group Work, 13, 17-23.
  • Marshak, RJ (1993). Lewin Meets Confucius: A Re-view of the OD Model of Change. Journal
  • of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 29(4), 393-415.
  • Nahavandi, A, and Aranda, E (1994). Restructuring Teams for the Reengineered Organization.
  • Academy of Management Executive, 8(4), 58-68.
  • O’Conner, DD (1990). Trouble in the American Workplace: The Team Player Concept Strikes
  • Out. ARMA Record Management Quarterly, 24(2), 12-15.
  • Pence, P (1996). Is Your Organization Really Committed to Teams? A Self-test for Measuring
  • your Organization’s Commitment. Empowerment in Organizations, 4(2), 22-28.