Srusti Management Review

A Journal of Management & IT

ISSN NO: 0974-4274(PRINT), ISSN NO: 2582-1148(ONLINE)Listed in Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, INDEXED IN J-GATE E-JOURNAL GATEWAY, EBSCOHOST, PROQUEST, U.S.A. & GOOGLE SCHOLAR A Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal

Corporate Social Responsibility - A Study in National Aluminium Company Limited

Year 2013
Volume/Issue/Review Month Vol. - VI | Issue II | July - December
Title Corporate Social Responsibility - A Study in National Aluminium Company Limited
Authors C. R. Satpathy , Leena P. Singh
Broad area Corporate Social Responsibility - A Study in National Aluminium Company Limited
Abstract
In the late 1880s, in the introduction stage of industrialization, it was broadly discussed that whether or not companies
should take their social responsibility. This discussion has today concluded as Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR). Judging by the first-named author’s recent media trawl (her book BRICS and Beyond is based on a six
months survey of The Economist and Financial Times), there is an increasing level of interest in aspects of CSR in
the operations of international business in emerging markets. This can take two forms – the more reactive approach
of avoiding CSR-related “transgressions” on both sides – for both the foreign and local partners involved in international
business in emerging markets; and the more proactive way of trying to launch CSR initiatives so that the international
partner might add some value to the local community in which it is operating. The interest for CSR has grown rapidly
in the recent years and people have started demanding that companies should take their social responsibility. In the
same time companies have started to understand that they should use CSR as a powerful weapon to gain long term
gains which has a direct and positive impact on wealth maximisation. Thus, philanthropy is no longer limited to
signing cheques for social causes and welfare programmes. The corporate world is now reaching out to community.
The commitment is getting much deeper as a large section of employees including members of top management
are now doing there bit for causes close to their heart. In this context since the mining and manufacturing companies
and their core business activities directly affect the resourcefulness of the society and to curb this they must make
appropriate allocation in their budget. This paper focuses on the Corporate Social Responsibility of National Aluminium
Company Limited (NALCO). National Aluminium Company (Nalco) has so far spent more than Rs 100 crore towards
various social sector development activities. Creation of infrastructure in the surrounding villages for communication,
education, healthcare and drinking water gets priority in the periphery development plans of the company. The
present paper examines the extent of its involvement in social activities and peripheral development with a view to
recommend the strategic importance of being socially responsible to all the stakeholders. The methodology employed
was that the researchers examine the Annual Reports, Accounts and other secondary data available, compared the
turnover with their investment on CSR and made necessary comment on the compliance in respect of obligations
towards the stakeholders.
Description The field of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has grown exponentially in the last decade. There are different views on the role of the firm in society and disagreement as to whether wealth maximization should be the sole goal of a corporation. As a c
File
Referenceses
  • 1 Arora, B. and Puranik, R. (2004), ‘‘A review of
  • corporate social responsibility in India’’, Society
  • for International Development, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp.
  • 93-100.
  • 2 Balasubramanian, N.K., Kimber, D. and
  • Siemensma, F. (2005), ‘‘Emerging opportunities
  • or traditions reinforced?’’, Journal of Corporate
  • Citizenship, Vol. 17, pp. 79-92.
  • 3 Baskin, J. (2006), ‘‘Corporate responsibility in
  • emerging markets’’, Journal of Corporate
  • Citizenship, Vol. 24, pp. 29-47.
  • 4 Chapple, W. and Moon, J. (2005), ‘‘Corporate social
  • responsibility in Asia: a seven-country study of CSR
  • web site reporting’’, Business and Society, Vol. 44
  • No. 4, pp. 415-41.
  • 5 Consultancy, Research for Environmental
  • Management (CREM) (2004), ‘‘Corporate social
  • responsibility in India, policy and practices of Dutch
  • companies’’, CREM, Amsterdam.
  • 6 Fernando A. C. (2006), Corporate Governance:
  • Principles, Policies and Practices, Chennai, India,
  • Pearson.
  • 7 Hopkins, M. (2003). The Planetary Bargain:
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Comes of Age.
  • London: Macmillan Press.
  • 8 Jose, P.D., Bandi, R. and Mehra, M. (2003),
  • ‘‘Corporate social responsibility in the information
  • and communication technologies sector:
  • discussion’’, IIMB Management Review, December,
  • pp. 61-75.
  • 9 Khan, A.F. and Atkinson, A. (1987), ‘‘Managerial
  • attitudes to social responsibility: a comparative
  • study in India and Britain’’, Journal of Business
  • Ethics, Vol. 6 No. 6, pp. 419-32.
  • 10 Krishna, C.G. (1992), Corporate Social
  • Responsibility in India, Mittal Publications, New
  • Delhi.
  • 11 Mohan, A. (2001), ‘‘Corporate citizenship:
  • perspectives from India’’, Journal of Corporate
  • Citizenship, Vol. 2, pp. 107-17.
  • 12 Narwal, M. and Sharma, T. (2008), ‘‘Perceptions
  • of corporate social responsibility in India: an
  • empirical study’’, Journal of Knowledge
  • Globalization, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 61-79.
  • 13 Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee (2005) Corporate
  • Social Responsibility – Doing the Most Good for
  • Your Company and Your Cause. New Jersey: John
  • Wiley and Sons, Inc. (HB: pp. 307, $29.95 US,
  • ISBN: 0-474-47611-0)
  • 14 Raman, S.R. (2006), ‘‘Corporate social reporting
  • in India: a view from the top’’, Global Business
  • Review, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 313-24.
  • 15 Satpathy, C. R. & Singh, L. P. (2012). Corporate
  • Social Responsibility: A Study of Odisha Mining
  • Corporation. Siddhant-A Journal of Decision
  • Making, 12, 143-151.
  • 16 Singh, J. (2008), ‘‘Tight rope walk at Tata Steel:
  • balancing profits and CSR’’, South Asian Journal
  • of Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 118-36.
  • 17 Sood, A. and Arora, B. (2006), ‘‘The political
  • economy of corporate responsibility in India’’,
  • Program Paper, Technology, Business and Society,
  • No. 18, United Nations Research Institute for Social
  • Development (UNRISD), Geneva.
  • 18 Sundar, P. (2000). Beyond Business: From
  • Merchant Charity to Corporate Citizenship. Indian
  • Business philanthropy through Ages Tata-McGraw-
  • Hill Publishing Company. New Delhi.
  • 19 Vardarajan, P. & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related
  • marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy
  • and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing,
  • pp. 58-74.
  • 20 Ward, H. & Fox, T. (2002). Moving the Corporate
  • Citizenship Agenda to South. International Institute
  • for Environment and Development (IIED). London.
  • 21 http://www.mallenbaker.net/csr/definition.php
  • (2004)
  • 22 http://www.nalcoindia.com/NalcoCSRBrochure.pdf
  • 23 h t t p : / / w w w. n a l c o i n d i a . c o m / N A L C O _
  • FOUNDATION.pdf