| Referenceses |
1. Miles R E and Snow C C (),
“Organisational Strategy, Structure and
Process”, New York, NY-McGraw Hills,
1978
2. Por ter, Michael E.. Competitive
Strategy, New York: The Free Press,
1980
3. Aragon Antonio –Sanchez and Gregorio
Sanchez-Martin, “Strategic Orientation,
Management Characteristics and
Performance: a study of Spanish SMEs”,
Journal of Small Business Management,
2005, Vol.43, No.3, pp 287-308.
4. Kumar Ashish and Shah Bhavin,
“Capital Budgeting Practices in
Indian Chemical Companies: A
Survey”, IMS Manthan, 2006, Vol.1,
Issue 2, October, pp 65-84.
Firm size as a moderator of the relationship between business ......
14 | Srusti Management Review Jan-June 2009
5. Hambrick, D.C., “Some tests of
effectiveness and functional attributes
of Miles and Snow’s strategic types”
Academy of Management Journal,
1983, Vol.26, No.1, pp5-26.
6. Hofer C W, “Toward a contingency
theory of Business strategy” Academy
of Management Journal, 1975,
Vol.18, pp 784-810.
7. Jennings D F, Daniel Rajaratnam,
Lawrence F B , “Strategy-
Performance Relationships in service
firms: A test for equifinality”, Journal
of Management Issues, 2003,
Vol.XV, No.2, Summer, pp 208-220.
ISBN 97860-9742114-7-3
8. John A Parnell, “Generic Strategy and
Business Performance: an empirical
test of the Miles and Snow Typology”,
British Journal of Management, 1993,
Vol.4, pp29-36.
9. Tamalee Kitima, Sulaiman Mohamed,
and Ismail Ishak, “Business Strategy
and Performance of Manufacturing
Firms in Thailand”, Paper presented at
conference organised by Oxford
Business and Economics, UK, on June
22-24, 2008.
10. Manoj Anand, “Corporate Finance
Practices in India: A Survey”,
Vikalpa, 2002, Vol.27, No.4,
October –December, pp29-56.
11.Namiki, N., (), Miles and Snow’s
Typology of strategy, perceived
environment uncer tainty and
organizational performance, Akron
Business and Economic Review,
1989, Vol. 20(2), 72-88
12.Parnell J A, “New Evidence in the
Generic Strategy and Business
Per formance Debate: A Research
Note”, British Journal of Management,
1997, Vol.8, pp175-181.
13. Shaker A Zahra and John A Pearce II,
“Research Evidence on the Miles –
Snow typology”, Journal of
Management, 1990, Vol.16, No.4,
pp751-768.
14.Short C J, Ketchen J D Jr, T B Palmer,
“Firm, Strategic Group, and Industry
influences on Performance”, Strategic
Management Journal, 2007, Vol. 28,
pp 147-167.
15.Simon S M Ho, H Pike Richard ,
“Organisation characteristics
influencing the use of risk analysis in
strategic capital investments” The
Engineering Economist, 1998,Vol.43,
No.3, Spring, pp247-268.
16.Slater S F and Narver J C, “Product-
Market Strategy and Performance: An
analysis of the Miles and Snow
Strategic Types”, European Journal of
Marketing, 1993, Vol.27, pp 33-51.
17.Smith, K.G., Guthrie, J.P., & Chen, M.J.,
“Strategy, size and performance”,
Organizational Studies, 1989, Vol.
10, No.1, pp63 – 81.
18.Thomas A.S., and Ramaswamy, K.,
“Matching managers to strategy:
Further tests of Miles and snow’s
typology”, British Journal of
Management, 1996, Vol. 7, pp247
– 261.
19.Thomas, A.S., and Ramaswamy, K. ,
“Matching managers to strategy: An
Investigation of Performance implications
and boundary conditions”, Australian
Journal of Management, 1994, Vol. 19,
No.1, June, pp73 – 93.
20.Blumentritt Tim and M Danis Wade,
“Business Strategy Types and
Innovative Practices”, Journal of
Managerial Issues, 2006, Vol. XVIII,
No.2, summer, pp 274-291. |
