ISSN NO: 0974-4274(PRINT), ISSN NO: 2582-1148(ONLINE)

  • Enlisted in UGC CARE Group - 1

  • Listed in Ulrich's Periodicals Directory

  • Indexed in J-Gate

  • Licensor for EBSCO

  • Listed in Proquest

  • Included in Google Scholar

  • Accessed in DOAJ

A Study on Relationship Between FDI Flows and Real Exchange Rates in India

Year 2017
Volume/Issue/Review Month Volume - X | Issue - II | July - December
Title A Study on Relationship Between FDI Flows and Real Exchange Rates in India
Authors K.S. Rao , Phani Kumar K.
Broad area A Study on Relationship Between FDI Flows and Real Exchange Rates in India
Abstract
This paper analyzes the relationship between the net capital flow components and other fundamentals and the real exchange rate (RER) in India consequent for the liberalization of the capital account in 1990s for the period 1996-1997 to 2012-13 using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach to co integration.  The estimation includes net capital flow components: foreign direct investment (FDI) flows, foreign portfolio flows, debt creating flows and other capital flows, government consumption expenditure, change in foreign exchange reserves, and current account balance as explanatory variables for investigating the relationship with the RER.   The empirical results indicate that FDI flows are not significantly associated with the real appreciation but portfolio flows and debt creating flows are associated with real appreciation in a statistically significant manner. Government consumption expenditure is not found to be significantly associated with real appreciation. Current Account Balance has a positive and statistically significant association with RER indicating that the outflows on account of current account deficits have been associated with depreciation of RER or prevention of the appreciation on account of capital flows. The change in foreign exchange reserves has a negative and statistically significant association with RER indicating that the accumulation of reserves by the Reserve Bank of India in the face of increasing net capital flows has prevented the appreciation of RER and mitigated their adverse consequences on the competitiveness of the Indian economy.
Description India has witnessed a large trend increase in cross border flows since the introduction of the economic reforms process in the external sector in early 1990s following the Balance of Payment (BoP) crisis. Net capital flows to India increased from US$ 7.1
File
Referenceses
  • Athukorala, P., & Rajapatirana, S. (2003). Capital inflows and the real exchange rate: A comparative study of Asia and Latin America. The World Economy, 26, 613–637.
  • Bakardzhieva, D., Naceur, S. B., & Kamar, B. (2010). The impact of capital and foreign exchange flows on the competitiveness of the developing countries. IMF Working Paper WP/10/154. International Monetary Fund.
  • Biswas, S., & Dasgupta, B. (2012). Real exchange rate response to inward foreign direct investment in liberalized India. International Journal of Economics and Management, 6, 321–345.
  • Calvo, G. A., Leiderman, L., & Reinhart, C. M. (1993). Capital flows and real exchange rate appreciation in Latin America: The role of external factors. IMF Staff Papers, 40, 108–151.
  • Calvo, G. A., Leiderman, L., & Reinhart, C. M. (1996). Inflows of capital to developing countries in the 1990s. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 123–139.
  • Combes, J. L., Kinda, T., & Plane, P. (2011). Capital flows, exchange rate flexibility and the real exchange rate. IMF Working Paper, WP/11/9.
  • Corbo, V., & Hernandez, L. (1994). Macroeconomic adjustment to capital inflows: Latin American style versus East Asian style. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1377, Washington, DC.
  • Corden, W.M. (1960). The geometric representation of policies to attain internal and external balance. Review of Economic Studies, 18, 1–22.
  • Corden, W. M., & Neary, J. P. (1982). Blooming sector and de-industrialization in a small open economy. Economic Journal, 92, 1–24.
  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distributors and estimators of autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.
  • Dornbusch, R. (1974). Tariffs and nontraded goods. Journal of International Economics, 4, 177–185.
  • Dua, P., & Sen, P. (2006). Capital flow volatility and exchange rates: The case of India. Working Paper No. 144, Centre for Development Studies. Delhi School of Economics.
  • Edwards, S. (1998). Capital flows, real exchange rates, and capital controls: Some Latin American experiences. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper 68400.
  • Elbadawi, I.A., & Soto, R. (1994). Capital flows and long-term equilibrium exchange rates in Chile. Policy Research Working Paper1306. The Word Bank.
  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.
  • Gaiha, A., Padhi, P., & Ramanathan, A. (2014). An empirical investigation of causality from capital flows to exchange rate in India. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1, 1–10.
  • Goel, S. & Saradhi, V.R. (2014). An empirical analysis of the relationship between capital flows and the real exchange rates in India. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, Walden University, 13, 68-81.
  • Javorick, B.S. (2004). Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages. American Economic Review, 8, 605-627.
  • Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.
  • Jongwanich, J., & Kohpaiboon, A. (2013). Capital flows and real exchange rates in emerging Asian countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 24, 138–146.
  • Khan, M. S., & Reinhart, C. M. (1995). Capital flows in the APEC region. IMF Occasional Paper. Washington, DC.
  • Kohli, R. (2001). Capital flows and their macroeconomic effects in India. Working Paper ICRIER, No. 64. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
  • Lartey, E. (2007). Capital Inflows and the Real Exchange Rate: An Empirical Study of Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of International Trade and Economic & Economic Development, 16, 337-357.
  • Mejia, L. J. (1999). Large capital flows: A survey of the causes, consequences, and policy response. IMF Working Paper WP/99/17. International Monetary Fund.
  • Mohan, R. (2008). Capital flows to India. BIS Paper 44. Bank for International Settlements.
  • Pesaran, B., & Pesaran, M. H. (2009). Time series econometrics using Microfit 4.0: A user’s manual. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century (pp. 371–412). The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith R. J. (1996). Testing for the existence of a long-run relationship. DAE Working Paper, No. 9622. University of Cambridge.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith R.J. (2001). Bounds testing approach to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–236.
  • Philips, P., & Perron, P. (1988).Testing for unit root in time series regression. Biometrica, 75, 335–46.
  • Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2005, December). Revision of nominal effective exchange rate (NEER) and real effective exchange rate (REER) indices. Bulletin.