ISSN NO: 0974-4274(PRINT), ISSN NO: 2582-1148(ONLINE)

094390-15757 journal@srustiacademy.ac.in

Srusti Management Review (SMR)

Enlisted in UGC CARE Group - 1 | Journal of Management & IT

  • Enlisted in UGC CARE Group - 1

  • Listed in Ulrich's Periodicals Directory

  • Indexed in J-Gate

  • Licensor for EBSCO

  • Listed in Proquest

  • Included in Google Scholar

  • Accessed in DOAJ

Functionality and Challenges of e-Governance Readiness

Year 2017
Volume/Issue/Review Month Volume - X | Issue - II | July - December
Title Functionality and Challenges of e-Governance Readiness
Authors Leonard T. Das
Broad area Functionality and Challenges of e-Governance Readiness
Abstract
The digital duality is a dynamic concept. It  refers to the gap between people who have access to the Internet and those who do not. It can have  global , national and  regional dimensions. The digital divide can never be contained in isolation but the effort has to be multi-dimensional and multi-pronged. ICTs are one of the enabling tools to bridge digital divide. It is argued Internet to be a true mass medium, it will have to achieve harmony among all consumer segments. The e-Governance indices are benchmarking and ranking tools . The four stages of e-government :   (1) cataloguing, (2) transaction, (3) vertical integration, and (4) horizontal integration offer a path for governments to follow and suggest challenges, both in terms of the organization and technical aspects. This paper argues that  continuous assessment and reconsideration of e-Governance benchmarking frameworks is crucial for sustained improvement.
Description The dichotomy of ‘digital divide’ exists between those in cities and rural areas, educated and uneducated, economically well off and deprived classes; developed, developing and least developed countries. It has social consequences. The other observ
File
Referenceses
  • Bakry, S. H. (2003), ‘Toward the Development of a Standard E-readiness Assessment Policy’, International Journal of Network Management, 13(2), 129–137.
  • Bui, T. X., Sankaran, S. R., & Sebastian, I. M. (2003). A framework for measuring national e-readiness. International Journal of Electronic Business, 1(1), 3–22.
  • Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 365–387.
  • Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-Government evaluation: A framework and case study.
  • Halchin, L. E. (2004), ‘Electronic Government: Government Capability and Terrorist Resource’, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 406-419.
  • Hanafizadeh, P., Hanafizadeh, M. R., & Khodabakhshi, M. (2009). Taxonomy of e-readiness assessment measures. International Journal of Information Management, 29, 189–195.
  • Haq, M. (1995). Reflections on human development. New York: Oxford Univ Press.
  • James, J. (2001), ‘Bridging the Digital Divide with Low Cost Information Technologies’, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 23(9).
  • Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R., & Van Eck, D. (2001). Gauging e-Government: A report on Implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly, 18.
  • Kunstelj, M., & Vintar, M. (2004). Evaluating the progress of e-Government development: A critical analysis. Information Polity, 9, 131–148.
  • Layne, K. and Lee, J. (2001), ‘Developing Fully Functionally E-government: A Four Stage Model’, Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122-136.
  • Means, G. and Schneider, D. (2000), ‘Meta-capitalism: The E-business Revolution and the Design of 21st Century Companies and Markets’, New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 
  • Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2008).A framework for evaluating Websites of public authorities. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60(5), 517–546.
  • Rao, S. S. (2005), ‘Bridging Digital Divide: Efforts in India’, Telematics and Informatics, 22, 361-375.
  • Accenture (2004), ‘E-Government Leadership: High Performance, Maximum Value’ Retrieved October 29, 2009, from http://www.accenture.com/NR/rdonlyres/D7206199-C3D4- 4CB4-A7D8-846C94287890/0/gove_egov_value.pdf.
  • Affisco, J. and  Soliman, K. (2006), ‘E-Government: A Strategic Operations Management Framework for Service Delivery’, Business Process Management Journal, 12(1), 13–21.
  • United Nations (2010). United Nations e-Government survey 2010: Leveraging e-Government at a time of financial and economic crisis. Retrieved July 19, 2010, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN-DPADM/UNPAN038853.
  • West, D. (2007). Digital government: Technology and public sector performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • World Bank (2009). Governance matters 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2010 from http://info. worldbank.org/governance/wgi/mc_countries.asp.
  • West, D.M. (2004). E-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.