This paper emphasizes in giving the concept of Glass Ceiling a different
perspective. The phenomenon is observed and analyzed through
various angles to find out the rationale behind. The article after
explaining the basics like the origin, the present state etc, takes a path
where it critically evaluates and takes its stand favourable for certain
factors which traditionally have been blamed for generating the Glass
ceiling and restricting women employees from getting into top
positions. Those factors include the employer who decides on the
policy regarding the ceiling, the competency of the women employee
who is considered to be the victim, the system existing in the
organizations which have a role to play in deciding the ceiling like the
recruitment Board, Performance Appraisal etc. The article also discuss
the impact of glass ceiling on married couples working in same place
as it stands as an emerging challenge in every organization.

A guide to womenomics: The future of the world economy lies increasingly in female hands,
http://www.economist.com/node/6802551, Accessed on 12.04.2006.
Adsit D A, London M, Crom S and Jones D (1996), “Relationships between employee attitudes,
customer satisfaction and departmental performance”, Journal of Management
Development, Vol. 15, No 1, pp. 62-75.
Antonioni D (1994), “Improve the performance management process before discontinuing
performance appraisals”, Compensation and Benefits Review, Vol. 26, No 3, pp. 29-37.
Aswathappa K (2006), Human Resource and Personnel Management, Tata-McGraw-Hill, Noida.
Atwater L and Waldman D (1998), “Accountability in 360 degree feedback: Is it time to take the
360 degree feedback method to its next step?”, HR Magazine, pp. 96.
Budig M and Paula E (2001), “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood”, American Sociological Review,
pp.204-225.
Butcher D (2002), “It takes two to review”, Management Today, pp.54-59.
Chavez L (1995), Glass ceiling myth: Reality is women make different choices, Gannet News
Service, U.S.
Dessler G (2005), Human Resource Management, 9th Edition, Pearson Education Singapore
Flippo E B (1984), Personnel Management, McGraw Hill, Tokyo.
Hymowitz C (1999), “The Glass Ceilings Jagged Edge in a slowing economy, Women who
achieve now face sharper scrutiny”, Asian Wall Street Journal, pp.3.
Ivins M (1999), “Pay Gap a Very Real Problem”, Lincoln Journal Star.
Jawahar I M and Williams C (1997), “Where all the children are above average: The performance
Appraisal Purpose Affect”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 905.
Johnson C (2001), “Making Sure Employees Measure Up”, HR Magazine, Vol. 43, No 3, pp. 36-41.
Judge T A, Higgins C A and Cable D M (2000), “The Employment Interview: A review of recent
research and recommendations for future research”, Human Resource Management
Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 383-406.
Kopelman R E (1986), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings, Lexington Books, Lexington.
Lawler E E (1994), “Performance management: The next generation”, Compensation and Benefits
Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 16-19.
A Study on the Glass Celing Effect and its Rational Perspective
40 Srusti Management Review, Vol-IV,Issue-I, January-2011
Loftus M (1995), “Frisky business - Romance in the Workplace”, Psychology Today.
Luthans F (2005), Organizational Behavior, McGraw Hill, New York.
Lynn R (1994), “Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox Resolved”, Personality
and Individual Differences, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 257-271.
Madden R, Shattering the Glass Ceiling, http://home.earthlink.net/~rdmadden/webdocs/
Shattering_the_Glass_Ceili.html, Accessed on 3.12.2000
Marlowe C M, Schneider S L and Nelson C E (1996), “Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring
decisions: are more experienced managers less biased?”, Journal of Applied Psychology,
81( 4), 11 - 21.
McDowell J M, Singell L D and Ziliak J P (1999), “Cracks in the Glass Ceiling: Gender and
Promotion in the Economics Profession”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No.
2, pp. 392-396.
McFarlin DB and Rice RW (1992), “The role of facet importance as a moderator in job satisfaction
processes”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 41-54.
Mintz J (2005), “Large Firms increasingly rely on employees for Job referrals”, The Wall Street
Journal.
Mount M K, Sytsma M R, Hazucha J F and Holt K E (1997), “Rater-Ratee race effects in
developmental performance ratings of Managers”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 1,
pp. 59-69.
O’Callaghan E M (2005), “Is there a glass Ceiling in the Ivory Tower? A snap shot of current
research”, Mini conference student colloquium, Lathrop Hall.
Ostroff C (1992), “The Relationship between Satisfaction, Attitudes, and Performance: An
Organizational Level Analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77, No 6, pp. 963-974.
Siegel J (2000), “86 Your Appraisal Process?”, HR Magazine, No.10, October, p.199-206. Vol.
45, No. 10, pp. 199-206.
Silverman I. and Eals M. (1992), “Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and
data”, In. J.H Barkow, L.Cosmides & J.Tooby (Eds), The Adapted Mind, Oxford University
Press, New York.
Stajkovic A D and Luthans F (1999), “The relative effects of different incentive motivators on work performance”,
Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, San Diego, CA, 1998.
Stanley J, (1993), Boys and Girls who reason well mathematically, In G.R. Bock & K. Ackrill
(Eds.), The origins and development of high ability, Wiley, Chichester, England.
Varney G H (1972), “Performance Appraisal-Inside and Out”, The Personnel Administrator, Vol.
17, pp. 15-17.
Waldfogel J (1998), “The Family Gap for Young Women in the United States and Britain: Can
Maternity Leave Make a Difference?”, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp.
505-545.
Women’s Progress in Workforce Improving Worldwide, But Occupational Segregation Still Rife,
http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/press-and-media-centre/press-releases/
WCMS_008040/lang—en/index.htm, Accessed on 11.12.1997.
Zellner W (2003), “Wal-Mart: The Plaintiffs already have won a victory by forcing the chain to
disclose so much workforce data”, Business Week.